Sujit Choudhry; a renowned constitutional lawyer, recently went ahead to debunk the constitutional provisions that surround the replacement of a senator. This came in the wake of the sudden death of Senator John McCain who succumbed to brain cancer. Sujit says as much as it may be important to talk about his legacy, it is equally vital that we look at the constitutional provisions regarding the mechanisms of his replacement.
In his bid to look at the processes relating to the replacement of a senator who resigns, dies or is elected as president, Sujit makes reference to the Seventeenth Amendment. This amendment states that the governor of the state whose senator has died, resigned or elected president ought to appoint an acting senator until a time when an election takes place. However, this amendment is quite flexible and can be applied in several ways.
It would, however, be noted that this provision also works differently based on the states involved. Arizona, for instance, is one of the 36 states that allow the appointed senators to run for the seat in the next general election but can also step down in cases where the appointment was temporary. For the other 14 states, however, a special election has to be called. Notably, 4 states forbid the governor from making an appointment until the next general election is done.
Sujit Choudhry is an internationally recognized law guru who has been involved in the constitutional development of several countries. He holds a law degree from Toronto, Oxford and Havard. He has previously served as a law clerk for the supreme court of Canada’s Chief Justice, Antonio Lamer.
Professor Choudhry’s research focuses on a variety of issues especially in the field of comparative constitutional law and politics. He has mastered constitutional design as a tool that can help manage the transition from the state of violent conflict to a peaceful democratic process.
In the course of his research, Sujit Choudhry has managed to publish well over ninety articles, working papers, book chapters and reports. He currently serves as the director of the Center for Constitutional Transitions that offers evidence-based policy options.
Read more about Choudhry here https://ca.linkedin.com/in/sujit-choudhry
Miami is a unique city with a booming economy. Todd Levine has lived in Miami for his entire life. He is a successful commercial litigator who was a founding partner at a law firm in the city.
Todd is also a real estate investor. He has made excellent investments in Miami over the years, and he plans to continue investing.
What is Commercial Litigation
Commercial litigation is a specific aspect of the legal industry. Building a home or business is a complex process. It is common for legal issues to arise during the construction process. An experienced commercial litigator can help protect companies from financial problems and legal issues.
When Todd Levine attended college, he did not plan on becoming an attorney. Instead, he earned a degree in business. However, he decided to enroll in law school because he wanted to make a high income. After graduating from law school, Todd started working at a small firm in Miami. He worked at the firm for several years, and then he decided to start a legal firm that focused on commercial litigation.
With Todd Levine’s successful career, he receives a substantial income each month. Instead of wasting his money, Todd purchases multiple investment properties each year. He now owns dozens of homes in Miami. Although he does not enjoy dealing with tenants, he does enjoy looking at real estate in the city.
Todd is one of the wealthiest business leaders in Miami. He plans to help people in the local community in the coming years. Although the city of Miami has a strong economy, there is a significant population of people living in poverty. Todd wants to improve the education system in the city. He also wants to improve access to healthcare for thousands of people in Miami.
See Todd’s Cruchbase profile here.
When the salary history law was passed in Philadelphia was passed, one of the groups that opposed it was the Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce. They vehemently opposed law terming it as an injustice to the business community. The Philadelphia chambers of commerce even went to the courts of law to try and seek for stay orders. One of the people who followed the case in the courts was Karl Heideck. The case was filed in a court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The group wanted the implementation of law halted until all the grey matter were sorted out.
The Chamber of Commerce argued in the court that the law was messing up the business environment in the municipality. They were however chastised by the presiding judge after they failed to show how exactly the business community would suffer from the implementation of the law. The court at the first stages of the case had delayed the implementation of the law, but after further listening to the case, the judge decided to lift the say orders. Philadelphia chamber of commerce was seeking to have complete blanket orders that would deter any further implementation of the law. However, this was not possible. The courts dismissed the case by the Philadelphia chamber of commerce. According to Karl Heideck, although the chamber of commerce had at the first stages managed to stop the law, Karl says that they had not managed to show the specific areas of the business that would be affected when the law was passed. He adds that the chambers of commerce did not put any substantive reason on why the law would be permanently stopped from implementation.
The passage of this law has raised compliance issues in the municipality. Karl helideck argues that the hiring departments of business operating in the area will have to be very careful on how they conduct their hiring processes. He adds that this department may be forced to hire lawyers to help them conduct interviews. Corporates in the municipality will need to be careful not to be drawn into legal cases the will affect their businesses
About Karl Heideck
He is one of the best commercial legal minds In Philadelphia. He was in James Beasley Temple University School of law where he earned his Juris Doctor.
He is popular in the city for being an active social media user as well as his writings regarding laws and legislation in the municipality of Philadelphia. He is a supporter of this law.
Read More: www.crunchbase.com/person/karl-heideck#/entity
According to statistics from AAA, road carnage is one of the highest causes of children’s deaths in the United States. It is has been up to the government to come up with measures that can mitigate these deaths. In the state of Pennsylvania as lawyer Karl Heideck explains in one of his articles; the legislators have taken the step of first passing legislation that will enhance the safety of children being carried in cars. Lawmakers thought this as one of the precautionary measures that can be taken to prevent the deaths of children on the state’s roads. The legislation, which is now law, seeks to have special car seats for children. As Philadelphia top lawyer, Karl Heideck explains, this law will go a long way in curbing cases of car owners not putting in place safety facilities for children protection.
According to Karl Heideck, the law which was passed in August 2016, came into effect in August of 2017, as there was a grace period of one year to have car owners comply with the law. Even law enforcers have not been punishing any car owner before the grace period was over. However, after the one year grace period was over, now car owners are bound to be punished if they do not comply with the law.
The law mandates car owner’s to shave children of less than two years have rear facing seats. The children must also be firmly held in the seats. According to research, it is highly likely that a child will not break his or her bones when sitting on a rear facing seat. Currently, those who do not comply with the law are being fined $125. The law also includes a clause on children who are below eight years. The law states that these children should sit on a booster seat. However, in this case, there are two exceptions. Children who weigh more than 80 pounds and those taller than 4 feet and 9 inches do not have to sit on booster seats.
Karl Heideck is a top lawyer in the city of Philadelphia. Karl Heideck went to Temple University Beasley School of Law from where he graduated with a Juris Doctor. Earlier in 2003, he had graduated with a degree in arts from Swarthmore College. Karl has been practicing law for more than a decade now. He specializes in employment law, corporate law, intellectual property and commercial litigation.
Read More: www.martindale.com/Karl-Heideck/168775858-lawyer.htm
Anyone who is looking for a good lawyer in Brazil ought to consider enlisting the services of Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho – a renowned litigator and Business Law expert.
There are many types of legal matters that can confront individuals, organizations, establishments and professionals. Numerous people and companies in Brazil turn to Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho for efficient and effective legal guidance and representation.
If you need a lawyer, it is important to be sure you’re getting the right one for your situation. Don’t just hire anyone you see out there to know more: https://www.instagram.com/ricardotostopr/ click here.
Ask your family, friends and business associates if they have hired an attorney that provided law service to them and whose fees were reasonable. Even if the attorney is someone who does not handle your type of case, the attorney may be able to recommend a law firm or legal representative he or she has confidence in. Getting recommendation can be a great way to locate a good lawyer.
Also, lawyer’s groups can be a reliable resource for getting the help you need. This involves conducting searches on the Internet, but your state Bar Association can also help you find these Brazilian lawyer’s groups. They can point you in the right direction and make it easier to find professional groups of attorneys who focus on different specialties.
When dealing with an important legal matter, whether person or business matter, it is a good idea to look for a lawyer who is well known in the industry due to his or her excellent track record.
Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho is a well established lawyer in Brazil. Ricardo Tosto has rendered top quality legal solutions for years and is well respected in the industry. Ricardo Tosto advises and guides businesses, entrepreneurs, corporate personnel and high-profile individual clients through a wide array of legal issues.
From helping clients decide on the best business structure for their venture to representing them or their organization in the event of lawsuit, from drafting contracts to reviewing employment policies, Ricardo Tosto works with various establishments and companies to resolve any legal matters that occur.
According to Brazilian law expert Ricardo Tosto, government service is one of the most popular career choices in Brazil, especially among law graduates. Brazilian law degrees take five years to complete and upon graduation, candidates who wish to practice law must take the bar exam in order to qualify. However, many law graduates who wish to work in the government pass on taking the bar exam. Instead, they concentrate on studying for the hyper-competitive selection examinations that are held for the purpose of filling vacancies in the government. Law graduates are especially interested in positions in the judicial system, as court clerks for instance.
However, there are a wide range of exams covering almost every aspect of government. Most government jobs are filled by competitive law examinations, so civil service exam prep is big business. In Brazil, it isn’t uncommon to see study guides for sale at newsstands or displayed prominently in bookstore windows.
Some positions are open to degree-holders in any area, whereas otherwise explicitly require legal training or some other professional registration. In addition, it is almost a requirement for applicants to the Federal Police to be law graduates. Because government jobs provide a high level of stability and, in some cases, more generous pay than the private sector, law continues to be a popular major as students eye government work.
Ricardo Tosto is a barrister and author in Sao Paulo, Brasil. His law firm, Ricardo Tosto & Associates, has offices in Sao Paulo, Brasilia, and Rio de Janeiro, and is one of Brazil’s most respected legal practices.
In addition to his legal career, Ricardo Tosto is an avid reader and writer. He is a frequent contributor to industry publications and participates in conferences and professional events. Ricardo Tosto is a graduate of Brazilian Lawyer School, one of Brazil’s top legal training institutions.
Recently the Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC, employed a gentleman by the name of Jordan A. Thomas. Jordan worked as the Assistant Director, but he also held another title in another division. In the SEC Division of Enforcement, Thomas was the Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel. During his time with the SEC, he wrote legislation that would eventually become the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, passed in 2010. At this act’s passing, Thomas began to lead a team of legal professionals in the country’s first Whistleblower Protection Practice. That Practice is called Labaton Sucharow, and it provides exceptionally sure representation for whistleblowers.
The Dodd-Frank act can only do so much to help whistleblowers, however. Firstly, though it offers employment protections codified in law, it is kind of difficult to blow the whistle and continue working at a company as though you hadn’t done anything. Other coworkers know about it, and even if everything you did was above the board, and you were clearly in the right, there will be some who begin to instinctively distrust you. But if the whistle can be blown anonymously, then you will be able to retain the trust you already had with coworkers while still reaping the benefits of working with the SEC. Because for those who blow the whistle, incentives become available. Specifically, ten to thirty percent of recovered sanctions are given to the whistleblower. The best way to maximize the amount of incentives received is to use cogent legal representation like Labaton Sucharow. Such representation can also help you remain anonymous, which is something you’ll want to be at work when all is said and done.
The United States has seen some severe economic downturns. The Great Recession is the name being leveled at the most recent collapse. With the Dodd-Frank act, Congress has passed measures that are the most severe since the Great Depression, which is an indicator of just how penultimate 2008’s recession really was. The saddest part is that much of this recession could have been easily avoided had whistleblowers had the courage and protection to do the right thing. Now that the law has brought that protection into reality, they can. It’s a long road to recovery, but with solid legal experts meting out top-notch protection, it is much more likely that individual freedoms can be preserved and expensive acts which lead to recession neatly curtailed.
Find a good SEC Whistblower Lawyer today